With respect to measurement of intimate envy, regarding 40 mind-report instruments had been advertised once the production of the brand new Worry about-Declaration 
and you will Projective Envy Bills (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of numerous devices were utilized only when. , 1992) intended to evaluate sex differences; the fresh new Multidimensional Jealousy Level (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) made to assess the about three dimensions of envy (intellectual, emotional and you may behavioral proportions); the Fb Envy Size (Muise, Christofides, & Des) intended for researching the likelihood of a conference that triggers attitude off jealousy players related to their hobby towards Facebook; the latest Envy Measure (Buunk, 1997), always see about three kind of jealousy (activated, nervous and you will precautionary) plus the Social Jealousy Size (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and this evaluates the newest bad emotion as a consequence of genuine or threatened losings out of a liked person to a competitor.
From inside the Brazil, new Close Jealousy Catalog was modified (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) As for Colombia, there are no psychometric knowledge of a certain size to the personal jealousy
Regarding the Latin-american context, you will find an adaptation for the Chile of List out-of Behavior of the Pair That can cause Envy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). Within the Mexico, an excellent Multidimensional Measure of Envy (Diaz-Enjoying, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) might have been elaborated and an initial studies is done with the fresh Multidimensional Collection off Romantic Envy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). Simultaneously, earlier in the day degree don’t do Factorial Confirmatory Investigation (CFA) to validate the latest foundation build found, and you can lowest accuracy accounts was basically used in their items (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or small trials were utilized (Mota mais aussi al., 2016).
The brand new IJS establish getting Mathes and you will Severa (1981) is one of the most put balances to possess contrasting personal envy, they located half dozen activities one to measure the sensitiveness so you’re able to risks relevant to: (a) Partner’s infidelity and matchmaking anybody else (facts step one, step three, several, 14, 15, sixteen, 20, twenty-two, 23, and you can twenty five); (b) Lover’s prominence (facts dos, 3, 4, seven, 10, thirteen, 17, 20, and you may 23); (c) An untrustworthy spouse (factors 1, 4, six, 19, and you can 21); (d) Partner’s old dates (circumstances eleven, 24, 26, 27, and you may twenty-eight); (e) Partner’s apathy (situations 8, nine and you will twenty-four); and (f) Lover’s left household members which have old dates and gender differences (items 5 and 18).
All the products mentioned above show sufficient quantities of authenticity and reliability
You will find four studies that have checked out in terms of the accuracy and you may validity. Mathes and you may Severa (1981) present a couple of knowledge, and also the earliest studies performed the development of the scale which have 39 circumstances, which was reduced to twenty-eight circumstances immediately following mathematical studies. After that, in a moment studies, IJS was utilized next to almost every other bills one examined romantic like-links, low self-esteem, self-esteem and you may an ad hoc survey off separate identities, guaranteeing, predicated on theory, your advanced level out-of envy, the greater the degree of Close love as well as the less the newest independent identity of your own couples. Within analysis, i statement a beneficial coefficient of precision regarding .ninety-five toward complete level. Inside the a third investigation, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you may Cock (1982), in order to stretch the brand new evidence off legitimacy, used the IJS as well as 2 behavioral measures: (a) chances whenever exposed to a rival and (b) expressions off possessiveness on the lover, compliment of a telephone call that they built to the person who took part in the study. The new requested correlations was indeed obtained, and that once more offered brand new authenticity of your size. Fundamentally, from inside the a 4th data, Mathes, Roter and you may Joerger (1982) corroborated this new convergent validity from IJS together with other bills you to examined personal envy.